Secular Advocacy Update

October 22 @ 8:00 pm โ€” 9:30 pm

The politยญiยญcal sitยญuยญaยญtion in this counยญtry is in flux and peoยญple might not know where to put their enerยญgy since there is so much going on. SHoWLE President Doug Berger will host a zoom call about what you can do in these tryยญing times. He will focus on church and state issues such as more anti-abortion actions in the state legยญisยญlaยญture, the conยญtinยญued disยญrupยญtion of pubยญlic schools from vouchยญers and Lifewise, chalยญlenges in the Toledo area, and nationยญal conยญcerns like the recent anti-atheist NSPMโ€‘7 memo that President Trump issued.

This call will be open to anyยญone who wants to supยญport real reliยญgious freeยญdom and civยญil rights.

To regยญisยญter for the call click the link https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tBDZzv6iTfWxRk2CHgzMIQ

Douglas Berger

567โ€“302-0209

Online via Zoom

Not a book club book club: October 2025

October 25 @ 10:00 am โ€” 12:00 pm

Join our book club. Unlike most book clubs, we donโ€™t name a book all should read to disยญcuss latยญer. Come to the club to share with us a book you are readยญing now or have read and tell us why we should read it. You can also share any interยญestยญing newsยญpaยญper or magยญaยญzine artiยญcles youโ€™ve read.

We will be in Community Room B

This event is FREE and open to the pubยญlic

Online via Zoom

Public School Advocates Release Lifewise Tool-kit

Some concerns with HB 445 and RTRI

Most of you know we have been focused on the growth of Lifewise Academy and the inherยญent probยญlems it creยญates for our pubยญlic schools. President Doug Berger has been workยญing for a few months with a team made up of a cross-section of peoยญple conยญcerned with Lifewise. It was led and hostยญed by Honesty for Ohio Education and on August 29th they released a tool-kit and othยญer inforยญmaยญtion the pubยญlic can use to limยญit or elimยญiยญnate the damยญage done by Lifewise.

For those new to the issue, Lifewise is a Released Time Religious Instruction (RTRI) proยญgram that, with parental perยญmisยญsion, removes kids from their pubยญlic school and takes them off-campus to a Bible school class durยญing the school day.

This is a probยญlem on many levยญels. Lifewise refusยญes to have their proยญgram before or after school, they have used friends in the state legยญisยญlaยญture to strong arm disยญtricts who wonโ€™t let them operยญate, and the proยญgram is less than transยญparยญent in their operยญaยญtions.

The tool-kit goes over in more detail all the issues with the Lifewise proยญgram.

SHoWLE opposยญes RTRI on church and state grounds and would love for disยญtricts not to have a polยญiยญcy at all. But we have been workยญing with the Honesty team to come up with some soluยญtions that proยญtect the school disยญtricts and the chilยญdren involved. These proยญtecยญtions are missยญing from the state law Lifewise is abusยญing. The tool-kit includes a modยญel polยญiยญcy that disยญtricts should adopt or use to revise their curยญrent polยญiยญcy if they have one.

Honesty and SHoWLE oppose HB 445 and SB 293 which would require school disยญtricts to have an RTRI polยญiยญcy but would not address the seriยญous issues raised about Lifewise.

Our President Doug Berger got to help make the preยญsenยญtaยญtion on the 29th and here is a copy of the remarks he planned to make but due to time conยญstraints was not able to speak from them entireยญly.

My name is Douglas Berger and I am the founder and presยญiยญdent of the Secular Humanists of Western Lake Erie. I have been folยญlowยญing this issue since 2014 when the law that Lifewise is abusยญing was passed in the Ohio Legislature. Ohio Revised Code 3313.6022 was nevยญer intendยญed to be used to allow the mass moveยญment of pubยญlic school chilยญdren from the school to a Bible class in the midยญdle of their school day. The law was intendยญed to give high school stuยญdents the chance to gain course credยญit for reliยญgious classยญes they might attend durยญing the day in addiยญtion to their regยญuยญlar course work. The law sat on the books for almost 10 years before Lifewise came into exisยญtence and abused the law for their own ends.

Released time has been part of the fabยญric of the pubยญlic school since the US Supreme Court case Zorach v Clauson was decidยญed in 1952. All schools have poliยญcies now that allow for stuยญdents to be takยญen out of school by parยญents for reliยญgious reaยญsons. I know from my own hisยญtoยญry that some of my classยญmates would leave school to parยญticยญiยญpate in Ash Wednesday mass and return to school with ash on their foreยญhead. I also know that some rurยญal Hancock counยญty schools, my home counยญty, have had RTRI proยญgrams since the 1970s. This is a comยญmon occurยญrence.

The issue isnโ€™t Released time but the abuse of it by Lifewise and any proยญgram that refusยญes to operยญate before or after school as has been done for more than 50 years by othยญer operยญaยญtors who actuยญalยญly respect the pubยญlic schools in which they exist.

Lifewise statยญed goal is to conยญvert chilยญdren to their brand of Christianity and to turn the pubยญlic schools into reliยญgious schools.

I am a taxยญpayยญer and firm supยญportยญer of the pubยญlic schools. The use of released time in the midยญdle of the school day hurts the eduยญcaยญtion of not only the kids who attend the proยญgram but the kids who are left behind.

I also have major conยญcerns with how Lifewise operยญates and I know that some have probยญlems with the theยญolยญoยญgy they teach which they refuse to freely share with anyยญone. They are known to bulยญly disยญtricts that donโ€™t coopยญerยญate or to use โ€œfriendsโ€ in state and local govยญernยญment to lean on them. There are now two bills in the legยญisยญlaยญture, one in the House is HB 445 and the one in the Senate is SB 293 that would force school disยญtricts to adopt poliยญcies under ORC 3313.6022 โ€” which wouldยญnโ€™t conยญtain any guardrails to proยญtect chilยญdren. That is what Lifewise wants so they can get around local disยญtricts who valยญue all stuยญdents eduยญcaยญtion more than the reliยญgious beliefs of a few.

Let me restate that Lifewise doesยญnโ€™t need the law to operยญate. They could start up a new proยญgram in any disยญtrict today but they want the state to force all disยญtricts in Ohio to allow them to operยญate durยญing the school day. If a disยญtrict refusยญes to allow Lifewise to interยญrupt the school day it isnโ€™t vioยญlatยญing a parยญenยญtโ€™s 1st amendยญment right to guide the eduยญcaยญtion of their chilยญdren. They can always put the stuยญdent in priยญvate school or in a proยญgram that operยญates before or after school.

I donโ€™t care that Lifewise is Christian and I wouldยญnโ€™t care about the reliยญgion or non-religion of a proยญgram that wants to disยญrupt a school day. I would still oppose the disยญrupยญtion.

I urge everyยญone to ask some seriยญous quesยญtions if your disยญtrict has a Lifewise proยญgram or if they are planยญning on comยญing to your disยญtrict. Work with your school board to install the guardrails missยญing from Ohioโ€™s Released Time law to proยญtect your chilยญdren and your school disยญtrict. Some of those guardrails are menยญtioned in the toolkยญit and also talk to your legยญisยญlaยญtor about this issue and conยญvince them why guardrails are needยญed and why this needs to be left up to the indiยญvidยญual school disยญtricts.

Thank you

For more inforยญmaยญtion about this issue and to view and downยญload the took-kit visยญit:

Honesty for Ohio Education โ€” RTRI Tool-Kit

Do We Really Need To Teach Young Kids About Human Sacrifice?

Public schools all over the counยญtry and espeยญcialยญly in Ohio are being invadยญed by a Christian Nationalist group called LifeWise. They claim to be teachยญing charยญacยญter valยญues using Bible stoยญries but in reviewยญing some of these Bible stoยญries, we have to ask, Do we want to be teachยญing young kids about Human sacยญriยญfice for examยญple?

LifeWise sets up in a local school disยญtrict and with parental perยญmisยญsion take kids off-campus for some Bible learnยญing disยญguised as Character and valยญue eduยญcaยญtion. They refuse to let the pubยญlic review their curยญricuยญlum and is in fact suing someยญone who legalยญly obtained a copy and postยญed it online.

Maybe this is why LifeWise refusยญes to let peoยญple outยญside of LifeWise see their curยญricuยญlum:

In the Elementary curยญricuยญlum, that is notยญed for Kindergarten through 3rd grade, Lesson 8 is about the charยญacยญter trait โ€œsacยญriยญficeโ€. One segยญment of the lesยญson talks about God testยญing Abraham. For those who donโ€™t know the stoยญry, God tells Abraham to take his son up into the mounยญtain and sacยญriยญfice him to show his loyยญalยญty to God.

God wants Abraham to murยญder his own son to show much he โ€œlovesโ€ God.

Abraham does what God says and takes his son up the mounยญtain, builds an alter, and is just about ready to do the deed and an Angel stops him and lets him know that since he was ready to murยญder Isaac he knew he feared God (ie. would do what God Wanted).

Side note: Isaac had no clue his father was preยญpared to murยญder him.

So, not only is LifeWise teachยญing litยญtle kids that human sacยญriยญfice can be a good thing as long as it is for God, here is this tidยญbit

Example of a LifeWise Lesson about Human Sacrifice

The lesยญson is to have 2nd and 3rd graders act out the Abraham stoยญry and for the othยญer kids to proยญvide sound effects. Have the kids act out human sacยญriยญfice for God? Some kids have issues with what is real and what is not so should we be teachยญing this parยญticยญuยญlar stoยญry? We donโ€™t think so.

That isnโ€™t the only probยญlemยญatยญic stoยญry. Here is a lesยญson about the trait subยญmisยญsion:

Submission means learnยญing to be a good folยญlowยญer. Instead of doing our own thing, we can do what we are asked. We donโ€™t talk back or demand our way. We choose to โ€œfolยญlow the leader,โ€ whether that is God, our parยญents, our teachยญers or othยญer good authorยญiยญties God puts in our lives.

LifeWise Lesson Example

In an ironยญic twist, the title of the lesยญson is โ€œJacobโ€™s New Nameโ€ and some of the activยญiยญties are kids choosยญing a new name as a game. Yet, Joel Penton, the founder of LifeWise is against kids choosยญing their own name to socialยญly tranยญsiยญtion at school. Also LifeWise trainยญing docยญuยญments make clear that the order of authorยญiยญty for chilยญdren is God then their Parents.

If this was a secยญuยญlar lesยญson about subยญmisยญsion (it wouldยญnโ€™t be called that in the first place), the teacher would also talk about caveats like are you being hurt or โ€˜has an adult asked you to keep a secret.โ€™ Unlike this Bible stoยญry we donโ€™t teach kids to nevยญer quesยญtion why an adult or parยญent is askยญing them to do someยญthing. There will be things a kid must do that they donโ€™t want to do โ€” like their homeยญwork or mowยญing the yard, but typยญiยญcalยญly they need to โ€œsubยญmitโ€ as long as it wonโ€™t hurt them in some way that typยญiยญcalยญly is illeยญgal if uncovยญered.

And what if a child actuยญalยญly murยญders their classยญmate and they say they did it because God told them to do it?

LifeWise doesยญnโ€™t have an answer for that.


If you are interยญestยญed in more inforยญmaยญtion about the probยญlems with LifeWise, check out our recent episode of Glass City Humanist.

Click on the image for link

Urge Toledo City Council To Mark Day Of Reason

May 4th is the National Day of Reason in 2024 and into the future. One of the ways we have wantยญed to mark the occasยญsion is to have the city counยญcil issue a resยญoยญluยญtion markยญing the day in the city. We werenโ€™t preยญpared for how hard it realยญly is to get it done. Thatโ€™s why we startยญed a petiยญtion.

Back in 2019, SHoWLE reached out to the Mayor of Toledo about issuยญing a proclaยญmaยญtion but his office declined and then the panยญdemยญic hapยญpened and our efforts fell by the wayยญside.

This year we decidยญed to focus on the city counยญcil since they have issued resยญoยญluยญtions for a whole host of issues with the most recent being demandยญing a cease fire in Gaza. So how hard could it be?

There is no writยญten forยญmal process but in talkยญing to a long time comยญmuยญniยญty activist, they sugยญgestยญed emailยญing the counยญcil presยญiยญdent with the request. We did that and heard nothยญing back. Not even a thank you for sendยญing this email. After reachยญing out again, the presยญiยญdent respondยญed back that our request had been missed and she declined to sponยญsor a resยญoยญluยญtion from us.

A resยญoยญluยญtion has to be sponยญsored by a memยญber of counยญcil and this being a resยญoยญluยญtion from a non-religious group to mark a day about reaยญson, there were not many counยญcil memยญbers to approach who would welยญcome our request. We idenยญtiยญfied anothยญer counยญcil memยญber known for their proยญgresยญsive stances on the issues and advoยญcaยญcy for social jusยญtice and reached out to them. Never heard back. Again not even an acknowlยญedgeยญment they got the mesยญsage.

In conยญsultยญing our comยญmuยญniยญty activist friend again, he menยญtioned that counยญcil is innudatยญed with requests like ours all the time, they have no forยญmal office or staff at city hall, and most times they wonโ€™t act on anyยญthing unless they know citยญiยญzens are requestยญing it and will back their efforts.

Thatโ€™s where our petiยญtion comes into the picยญture.

Weโ€™ve startยญed a petiยญtion with the goal to ask the Toledo City counยญcil to adopt a Day of Reason resยญoยญluยญtion. The National Day of Reason is May 4th. so it is most likeยญly too late this year to get a resยญoยญluยญtion adoptยญed but we will share the petiยญtion with the counยญcil for next yearโ€™s Day of Reason. Wonโ€™t you help us out?

*Note* We would realยญly like to limยญit the signยญers to peoยญple who live in the city of Toledo but if you donโ€™t you can still help us out by makยญing a donaยญtion to SHoWLE.

Sign Our Petition Here

Judge Rules Against Catholic Families in Sylvania Bus Dispute

Images of Sylvania school bus

On Tuesday 3/19, Lucas counยญty Judge Stacy Cook ruled that the Sylvania City School District bus transยญportaยญtion plan for stuยญdents of non-public schools doesยญnโ€™t vioยญlate Ohio law or conยญstiยญtuยญtion.

Back in 2022, a couยญple of famยญiยญlies that send their chilยญdren to a catholic school in Sylvania, filed a lawยญsuit because their chilยญdren had to be picked up hours before their school startยญed, transยญportยญed with oldยญer stuยญdents, then dropped off at a high school to transยญfer to anothยญer bus, to arrive at their catholic school. The parยญents thought it was unlawยญful and vioยญlatยญed the equal proยญtecยญtion and reliยญgious freeยญdom clausยญes of the Ohio conยญstiยญtuยญtion.

From the rulยญing:

โ€œThe eviยญdence subยญmitยญted by plainยญtiffs conยญsist of sevยญerยญal affiยญdavits by the parยญties and a nonยญparยญty spouse. These affiยญdavits recite that they choose Catholic eduยญcaยญtion because of their perยญsonยญal Catholic faith. The affiยญdavits also recite the varยญiยญous inconยญveยญniences the Plaintiffs and their chilยญdren face because of the Districtโ€™s transยญportaยญtion scheme. However, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have offered no eviยญdence of any coerยญcive effects on their reliยญgious pracยญtice: there is no eviยญdence that the transยญportaยญtion plan has comยญpelled Plaintiffs to do anyยญthing forยญbidยญden by their reliยญgion or that it has caused them to refrain from doing someยญthing required by their reliยญgion. Plaintiffs have also not offered any eviยญdence that the transยญportaยญtion plan has comยญpelled them to affirm or disยญavow a belief forยญbidยญden or required by their reliยญgion. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to demonยญstrate any coerยญcive effect upon their reliยญgious pracยญtice. The Plaintiffs have thereยญfore failed to show that Defendantsโ€™ transยญportaยญtion plan vioยญlates their right to free exerยญcise of reliยญgion under the Ohio Constitution.

The Court finds against Plaintiffs as to their claim that Defendantsโ€™ transยญportaยญtion plan vioยญlates their right to free exerยญcise of reliยญgion under the Ohio Constitution. Again, the preยญsumpยญtion that a legยญislaยญtive act is conยญstiยญtuยญtionยญal applies to the Boardโ€™s transยญportaยญtion plan. With this preยญsumpยญtion the Court finds in favor of Defendants as to Plaintiffsโ€™ free exerยญcise claim.โ€

JENNIFER A SWIECH, et. al., v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SYLVANIA CITY SCHOOL DIST., et. al.,

Both parยญties had asked for a sumยญmaยญry judgeยญment since the facts in the case werenโ€™t in disยญpute. In the origยญiยญnal lawยญsuit the famยญiยญlies asked the court for an injuncยญtion to order the school disยญtrict to โ€œfixโ€ the transยญportaยญtion plan. Judge Cook said the court couldยญnโ€™t do that, it could only rule if the disยญtricยญtโ€™s act was lawยญful and not unconยญstiยญtuยญtionยญal.

The origยญiยญnal lawยญsuit was disยญmissed by the parยญents on August 30, 2022. Parents refiled on September 16, 2022 and asked for class action staยญtus and removed all refยญerยญences to the 1st amendยญment to keep it out of Federal court. The class action was nevยญer cerยญtiยญfied.

A lawyer for the famยญiยญlies, who was one of the plainยญtiffs when the lawยญsuit had been filed in August 2022 but dropped out in September of 2022, statยญed they were probยญaยญbly going to appeal the rulยญing.

Additional inforยญmaยญtion on this stoยญry is in the Toledo Blade behind a payยญwall. Images of the artiยญcle is below.

A Released Time Religious Instruction FAQ is now available

We were conยญtactยญed recentยญly by someยญone who lives in the Sylvania Public school disยญtrict. She said that LifeWise had a preยญsenยญtaยญtion schedยญuled for the next school board meetยญing and wantยญed to know if we had any inforยญmaยญtion about the group.

Released Time Religious Instruction is allowed under Ohio Revised Code 3313.6022. The big takeยญaway is that school disยญtricts arenโ€™t required to adopt RTRI poliยญcies.

Other points from the law:

(1) The studentโ€™s parยญent or guardian gives writยญten conยญsent.

(2) The sponยญsorยญing entiยญty mainยญtains attenยญdance records and makes them availยญable to the school disยญtrict the stuยญdent attends.

(3) Transportation to and from the place of instrucยญtion, includยญing transยญportaยญtion for stuยญdents with disยญabilยญiยญties, is the comยญplete responยญsiยญbilยญiยญty of the sponยญsorยญing entiยญty, parยญent, guardian, or stuยญdent.

(4) The sponยญsorยญing entiยญty makes proยญviยญsions for and assumes liaยญbilยญiยญty for the stuยญdent.

(5) No pubยญlic funds are expendยญed and no pubยญlic school perยญsonยญnel are involved in proยญvidยญing the reliยญgious instrucยญtion.

(6) The stuยญdent assumes responยญsiยญbilยญiยญty for any missed schoolยญwork.

LifeWise Academy is a large reliยญgious group based in Columbus that works with local groups to install Bible classยญes in school disยญtricts. In 2022, LifeWise brought in over $6 milยญlion in donaยญtions, enrolls nearยญly 30,000 stuยญdents from more than 300 schools across more than 12 states. LifeWise has a strong presยญence in Ohio. LifeWise will be in more than 170 Ohio school disยญtricts by next school year โ€” more than a quarยญter of the stateโ€™s school disยญtricts.

LifeWise only teachยญes Christianity and only hires Christians to be instrucยญtors and staff.

The othยญer issues we have is that chilยญdren are being removed from school grounds for an hour more by peoยญple who donโ€™t work for the school disยญtrict and who the disยญtrict doesยญnโ€™t vet. The classยญes have absoluteยญly no conยญnecยญtion to anyยญthing being taught in the pubยญlic school. It is basiยญcalยญly a Sunday school durยญing the week. LifeWise claims it is teachยญing charยญacยญter valยญues but you can learn those valยญues withยญout reliยญgion.

We have creยญatยญed a FAQ page about Released Time Religious Instruction with addiยญtionยญal inforยญmaยญtion about the classยญes and LifeWise.

SHoWLE Disappointed By 303 Creative Court Decision

Toledo, July 1, 2023 โ€” The Secular Humanists of Western Lake Erie are very disยญapยญpointยญed in the rulยญing on June 30 by the US Supreme Court in the 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis case. It is wrong that reliยญgious beliefs now trump all othยญer rights to full pubยญlic busiยญness accomยญmoยญdaยญtions and allow disยญcrimยญiยญnaยญtion of peoยญple in a proยญtectยญed class.

The court said that requirยญing the graphยญic designยญer to make wedยญding webยญsites for same-sex couยญples was an unconยญstiยญtuยญtionยญal vioยญlaยญtion of her first amendยญment rights because the creยญation would be seen as an endorseยญment of someยญthing her reliยญgious beliefs proยญhibยญit.

We donโ€™t believe requirยญing busiยญness ownยญers not to disยญcrimยญiยญnate against cusยญtomers in proยญtectยญed classยญes makes the perยญson or busiยญness endorse someยญthing against their reliยญgious beliefs. At the end of the day they can still not approve of same-sex marยญriages. If a busiยญness canโ€™t bring itself to serve cusยญtomers from the proยญtectยญed classยญes then they need not be a pubยญlic busiยญness.

We are also conยญcerned about the unpreceยญdentยญed proยญtecยญtion the court grantยญed to a reliยญgious perยญson. They ruled on a case that didยญnโ€™t include any actuยญal harm. The plainยญtiff wasยญnโ€™t creยญatยญing wedยญding webยญsites when she filed the lawยญsuit and there is some quesยญtion that the LGBT cusยญtomer writยญten about in her case was made up. Secular peoยญple who claim their reliยญgious freeยญdom was vioยญlatยญed, like for examยญple chalยญlengยญing 10 Commandment statยญues on court house lawns, are disยญmissed because the mere presยญence of the reliยญgious item or text isnโ€™t an actuยญal harm accordยญing to fedยญerยญal courts.

The plainยญtiff agreed in court that she would sell her serยญvices to LGBTQ peoยญple, just not wedยญding webยญsite designs. So her reliยญgious beliefs are not absolute. How does makยญing a sign for a gay man not also seem to endorse his sexยญuยญal oriยญenยญtaยญtion?

The deciยญsion was capriยญcious and arbiยญtrary and gave speยญcial rights to reliยญgious peoยญple that are not allowed by anyยญone else. The Christian Nationalists have been bent on subยญvertยญing decades of church and state legal deciยญsions.

The US Supreme Court set back reliยญgious freeยญdom for many years.


For furยญther inforยญmaยญtion on this deciยญsion see: Supreme Court rules webยญsite designยญer can decline to creยญate same-sex wedยญding webยญsites

About Secular Humanists of Western Lake Erie

The misยญsion of the Secular Humanists of Western Lake Erie is to proยญvide a supยญportยญive local comยญmuยญniยญty for humanยญists and othยญer nonยญtheยญists, while proยญmotยญing an ethยญiยญcal, reaยญsonยญable, and secยญuยญlar approach to life through eduยญcaยญtion, comยญmuยญniยญty serยญvice, outยญreach, activism, and social events.

We enviยญsion a Northwest Ohio and Southeast Michigan where secยญuยญlar peoยญple are respectยญed and inteยญgratยญed in broadยญer sociยญety, live valยญues of reaยญson and comยญpasยญsion, and enjoy a friendยญly humanยญist comยญmuยญniยญty.

#

PDF of Statement Available Here

Ohio Attorney General Wrong To Insert State Into Religious School Lawsuit

The Secular Humanists of Western Lake Erie (SHoWLE) have issued the folยญlowยญing stateยญment on the brief filed by Ohio Attorney General David Yost in supยญport of a lawยญsuit brought by three reliยญgious schools against a Lucas counยญty pubยญlic health order closยญing all schools in the counยญty to in-person instrucยญtion.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 29, 2020

Ohio Attorney General Wrong To Insert State Into Religious School Lawsuit

Toledo  โ€” The Secular Humanists of Western Lake Erie (SHoWLE) is extremeยญly disยญapยญpointยญed that Ohio Attorney General David Yost has decidยญed to insert himยญself and the state into a Federal lawยญsuit by three Lucas County reliยญgious schools over the Lucas County Health Boardโ€™s order to close all schools in the counยญty to in-person instrucยญtion until January 11, 2021 due to the curยญrent COVID-19 panยญdemยญic.

Like the origยญiยญnal lawยญsuit, Attorney General Yost makes the same arguยญment that was rejectยญed by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on December 14th, that the reliยญgious schools should be treatยญed like non-education secยญuยญlar busiยญnessยญes that were allowed to stay open.

Judge Helmick statยญed in his deciยญsion:

โ€œWhile, as Plaintiffs note, TLCHD has not ordered gyms, tanยญning salons, or casiยญnos to close, (Doc. No. 1 at 5โ€“6), these are not the relยญeยญvant โ€œcomยญpaยญraยญble secยญuยญlar activยญiยญties.โ€ Instead, the comยญpaยญraยญble secยญuยญlar activยญiยญties are eduยญcaยญtionยญal classยญes offered by all othยญer schools in Lucas County. These speยญcifยญic enviยญronยญments have subยญstanยญtialยญly simยญiยญlar groupยญings and moveยญments of indiยญvidยญuยญals. Emmanuel Christian, St. Johnโ€™s, and Monclova Christian are proยญhibยญitยญed from offerยญing in-person instrucยญtion to grades 9โ€“12 (or grades 7โ€“12) along with all othยญer Lucas County schools โ€œbecause the reaยญsons for susยญpendยญing in-person instrucยญtion apply preยญciseยญly the same to them.โ€โ€

Judge Helmick also notยญed that if we were to take the schoolโ€™s arguยญment to the logยญiยญcal conยญcluยญsion, the state would not be able to regยญuยญlate anyยญthing involved with a reliยญgious group.

โ€œPlaintiffsโ€™ arguยญments, thereยญfore, would extend to proยญhibยญit the govยญernยญment from regยญuยญlatยญing any aspect of a Christianโ€™s pubยญlic life because, as Plaintiffsโ€™ misยญsion stateยญments make clear, the purยญpose of proยญvidยญing โ€œa bibยญliยญcal founยญdaยญtion for โ€ฆ stuยญdentsโ€ is to preยญpare stuยญdents โ€œto exemยญpliยญfy Christ [and] make Biblically-based deciยญsionsโ€ throughยญout an indiยญvidยญuยญalโ€™s life, and not only durยญing the schools years. Thus, a Christian busiยญness would be exempt from minยญiยญmum wage and maxยญiยญmum hour laws,9 while Christians in states where offiยญcials have issued Covid-19-related orders closยญing restauยญrants for in-person dinยญing could not be proยญhibยญitยญed from gathยญerยญing to share a meal in one of those restaurants.10

More closeยญly to the issue at stake in this case, Plaintiffsโ€™ arguยญments would mean States could not manยญdate that stuยญdents attendยญing parochial schools receive the equivยญaยญlent numยญber of hours required of public-school stuยญdents or require that parochial schools proยญvide coursยญes in speยญcifยญic subยญjects.โ€

The lawยญsuit, instead of tryยญing to proยญtect the right of the schools to be treatยญed equalยญly, is tryยญing to force the counยญty to treat reliยญgious schools difยญferยญentยญly than othยญer schools that have comยญplied with the order. They want a court to force the counยญty to give them prefยญerยญenยญtial treatยญment just because they are reliยญgious.

This is the comยญplete oppoยญsite meanยญing of the 1st amendยญment which is meant to keep reliยญgious activยญiยญties from being sinยญgled out by the govยญernยญment for being reliยญgious.

โ€œThe fact remains, rightยญly or wrongยญly, that the Lucas County pubยญlic health order specifยญiยญcalยญly exempts in-person reliยญgious activยญiยญties,โ€ SHoWLE presยญiยญdent Douglas Berger said. โ€œWe believe that churchยญes and reliยญgious groups, includยญing reliยญgious schools, should put the long-term health of their memยญbers above the need to gathยญer togethยญer for their reliยญgious activยญiยญties since those activยญiยญties arenโ€™t restrictยญed to hapยญpenยญing outยญside the home. It is for this reaยญson the pubยญlic health order, that explicยญitยญly exempts reliยญgious activยญiยญties of the schools, isnโ€™t an undue burยญden on them.โ€

It appears that Attorney General Yost has decidยญed, after claimยญing he would defend state pubยญlic health orders, and against the facts of the case, that prefยญerยญenยญtial treatยญment for reliยญgious schools is in the stateโ€™s best interยญests.

We strongยญly disยญagree with his deciยญsion to insert the state in this case with his brief to the court.


Reference:

Ohio AG files brief supยญportยญing reliยญgious schoolsโ€™ return to in-person instrucยญtion

Monclova Christian Academy et al v. Toledo-Lucas County Health Department 12/14/2020

SHoWLE President Douglas Berger disยญcussed this case in Episode 16 of the Glass City Humanist podยญcast startยญing at the 08:34 mark.


About Secular Humanists of Western Lake Erie

The misยญsion of the Secular Humanists of Western Lake Erie is to proยญvide a supยญportยญive local comยญmuยญniยญty for humanยญists and othยญer nonยญtheยญists, while proยญmotยญing an ethยญiยญcal, reaยญsonยญable, and secยญuยญlar approach to life through eduยญcaยญtion, comยญmuยญniยญty serยญvice, outยญreach, activism, and social events.

We enviยญsion a Northwest Ohio and Southeast Michigan where secยญuยญlar peoยญple are respectยญed and inteยญgratยญed in broadยญer sociยญety, live valยญues of reaยญson and comยญpasยญsion, and enjoy a friendยญly humanยญist comยญmuยญniยญty.

*Update* - On December 31, a three judge panยญel of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals grantยญed an injuncยญtion to the schools against the pubยญlic health order pendยญing an appeal hearยญing.